Copwatch - a project of Peace and Justice Works


Site Navigation

About us
People's Police Report
Shootings & deaths
Cool links
Other Information
Contact info


Training Advisory Council Notes "Us Vs. Them" Attitude,
Hears About Use of Force

In March, the Training Advisory Council (TAC) voted on issues to use as a basis for recommendations to the Portland Police Bureau. The only one that had to do with the substance of the training was a comment that instructors seemed to be perpetuating an "us vs. them" attitude between police and community members. Interestingly, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) raised the same concern with the Bureau in a February memo about the 2015 "in-service" trainings. While the DOJ went further and raised concerns about the focus on firearms use without an emphasis on de-escalation tactics, and the use of "military imagery" during scenario training, this is a big step for the TAC. In January, they had a (very lengthy) presentation from Officer Paul Meyer on the Bureau's Use of Force policy, and a (very brief) presentation about the quarterly force statistics report from Lt. Steve Jones, the "Force Inspector." Still, their meetings continue to be heavily dominated by discussions on how to structure their timelines to make recommendations, rather than how to stop police from racially profiling, using excessive force, and other concerns that led the their creation in 2012.

Meyer is the (former) advisory member to the Community Oversight Advisory Board who filed complaints against three community volunteers on the Board (PPR #67/article)

In his presentation, Meyer referred to the report in which City Auditor Mary Hull Caballero pointed out that only one officer was able to articulate the Bureau's policy clearly (PPR #66). His comment was that "this doesn't look good," but it wasn't clear if he was trying to refute her findings or to explain why the policy was included in the most recent "in-service" (where all 900 or so patrol officers receive 40 hours of training on various issues). The Compliance Officer/Community Liaison noted in his October semi-annual "outcomes report" that only 30.5% of cops think the Bureau's Force policy is clear.

The March discussion was focused on the Use of Force training curriculum, and much time was spent talking about learning methodologies (talk about "learning objects," for example) and ways computers could be used to improve delivery of training. In addition to their concern about "us vs. them," they also came up with the idea of making the Bureau's list of Directives easily accessible on a smartphone, as no handbook version has been published since 2009.

The Training Advisory Council meets on the second Wednesday of every other month, write to ppbtac@portlandoregon.gov for more information.

When the TAC started, there were four or five African American members. At the March meeting, there were none.
  People's Police Report

May, 2016
Also in PPR #68

Law to Shield Cops Defeated
  Fired Cop Reinstated
  OR State Shootings--141 in 6 Years
Sheriff May Resign Due to Scandals
DOJ Board Unclear on Policy Input
Bureau Boycotts Review Board
Profiling: State Spying, CPRC Meets
More Sweeps Despite Camping Rules
Report Exposes Racist, Sexist Cops
Training Council Notes "Us v. Them"
PPB Policy Review Suspended
Updates PPR 68
  • Cop Exonerated in Mistaken ID Case
  Mayor's Race and Police Issues
  Copcams on the Horizon in Portland
Quick Flashes PPR 68
  Another PPB Pervocop Gone
  Training Facility Used for Violent Fundraiser
  Motorcyclist Kicked by Cop Wins $180K
  MN Copwathers Seek Self-Insurance for Cops
Rapping Back #68

Portland Copwatch
PO Box 42456
Portland, OR 97242
(503) 236-3065/ Incident Report Line (503) 321-5120
e-mail: copwatch@portlandcopwatch.org

Portland Copwatch is a grassroots, volunteer organization promoting police accountability through citizen action.

People's Police Report #68 Table of Contents
Back to Portland Copwatch home page
Peace and Justice Works home page
Back to top